Model comparison
Command A vs Gemma 3 1B
Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 20.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
GoogleSummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 3 categories and Gemma 3 1B in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Command A leads 36.5 to 7.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard: 57.1% for Command A and 7.2% for Gemma 3 1B.
Side by side
| Command A | Gemma 3 1B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 20.7 |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | 2025-03-12 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 8K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 4 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Command A: 26.8 (#317), Gemma 3 1B: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1331 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Command A leads
Command A: 35.7 (#36), Gemma 3 1B: 13.5 (#144)
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | 7.2% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Command A: 17.7 (#276), Gemma 3 1B: 18.5 (#260)
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | — |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |
Math Command A leads
Command A: 33.5 (#172), Gemma 3 1B: 9.6 (#310)
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 1.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1300 | — |
Knowledge Command A leads
Command A: 36.5 (#157), Gemma 3 1B: 7.1 (#309)
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 19.9% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Command A: 45.5 (#166), Gemma 3 1B: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | — |
| LMArena French | 1352 | — |
| LMArena German | 1341 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1283 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1346 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Command A: 69.3 (#172), Gemma 3 1B: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Command A: 40.6 (#147), Gemma 3 1B: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Command A: 47.8 (#204), Gemma 3 1B: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1338 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command A better than Gemma 3 1B?
Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 20.7 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Command A and Gemma 3 1B share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3 1B has 4.