Model comparison
Gemma 3 1B vs GPT-5.2 Pro
GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 21.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.2 Pro leads 65.3 to 10.2.
- Gemma 3 1B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 3 1B | GPT-5.2 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Noometry Index | 21.1 | 52.3 |
| Released | 2025-03-12 | 2025-12-11 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 400K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $21 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $168 |
| Results tracked | 4 | 8 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: 13.7 (#152), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 7.2% | — |
Reasoning GPT-5.2 Pro leads
Gemma 3 1B: 19.2 (#264), GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.5 (#33)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 54.2% |
| SimpleBench | — | 57.4% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 79.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 90.5% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 155.4 |
Math GPT-5.2 Pro leads
Gemma 3 1B: 10.2 (#316), GPT-5.2 Pro: 65.3 (#29)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 74% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 46% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 31.3% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: 7.0 (#314), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 19.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3 1B better than GPT-5.2 Pro?
GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 21.1 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 1B and GPT-5.2 Pro share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 1B has 4 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.2 Pro has 8.