Model comparison
Gemma 3 1B vs Grok 4.7
Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 21.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 1B scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.7 in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok 4.7 leads 62.8 to 7.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.1% for Gemma 3 1B and 98.1% for Grok 4.7.
- Gemma 3 1B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 3 1B | Grok 4.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | |
| Noometry Index | 21.1 | 53.1 |
| Released | 2025-03-12 | 2026-09-21 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 500K |
| Max output | — | 500K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6 |
| Results tracked | 4 | 39 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Grok 4.7: 58.0 (#18)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierCode | — | 47.6% |
| CursorBench | — | 46.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1639 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 29.5% |
| SciCode | — | 57.8% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1427 |
Agentic & Tool Use Grok 4.7 leads
Gemma 3 1B: 13.7 (#152), Grok 4.7: 36.7 (#37)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 54.6% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 7.2% | — |
| GDP.pdf | — | 22.8% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 10,537 |
Reasoning Grok 4.7 leads
Gemma 3 1B: 19.2 (#264), Grok 4.7: 49.1 (#40)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 38% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 76.8% |
| CritPt | — | 18% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1413 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 29% |
| DTBench | — | 96% |
| LMCA | — | 49.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 153.53 |
Math Grok 4.7 leads
Gemma 3 1B: 10.2 (#316), Grok 4.7: 57.8 (#39)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | 98.1% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 53% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 17.1% |
| ProofBench | — | 34% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1407 |
Knowledge Grok 4.7 leads
Gemma 3 1B: 7.0 (#314), Grok 4.7: 62.8 (#22)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 19.9% | 92.7% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 56% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1422 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Grok 4.7: 35.5 (#87)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1228 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 32.5% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 20.8% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Grok 4.7: 50.8 (#116)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1389 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1455 |
| LMArena French | — | 1455 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1397 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1400 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Grok 4.7: 74.1 (#105)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1404 |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Grok 4.7: 43.1 (#104)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1413 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Grok 4.7: 70.0 (#24)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1399 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1391 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 2007 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1393 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3 1B better than Grok 4.7?
Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 21.1 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 1B and Grok 4.7 share?
3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 1B has 4 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.7 has 39.