Model comparison

Gemma 3 12B vs Step 3

Step 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.5 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3 12B Google

32.1

Rank #262 Confirmed

Step 3 StepFun

40.5

Rank #149 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 12B scores higher in 0 categories and Step 3 in 8 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Step 3 leads 37.6 to 22.3.

Side by side

Gemma 3 12B and Step 3 specifications
Gemma 3 12BStep 3
ProviderGoogleStepFun
Noometry Index32.140.5
Released2025-03-12—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K—
Max output8K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.05—
Output $ / M tokens$0.15—
Results tracked2417

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 3 leads

Gemma 3 12B: 31.7 (#280), Step 3: 40.1 (#147)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BStep 3
LMArena Coding12811367
SciCode17.4%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 3 12B: 25.5 (#108), Step 3: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BStep 3
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard30.4%—

Reasoning Step 3 leads

Gemma 3 12B: 15.7 (#313), Step 3: 28.4 (#105)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BStep 3
LMArena Hard Prompts13091355
Kagi LLM Benchmark—62.3%
CritPt0%—
Chess Puzzles0%—
DTBench48.8%—
LMCA4.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index123.5—

Math Step 3 leads

Gemma 3 12B: 22.3 (#279), Step 3: 37.6 (#148)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BStep 3
LMArena Math13071366
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202516.7%—

Knowledge Step 3 leads

Gemma 3 12B: 26.5 (#257), Step 3: 36.8 (#164)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BStep 3
LMArena Expert12481333
GPQA Diamond39.5%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate4.4%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 3 12B: —, Step 3: 35.5 (#86)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BStep 3
LMArena Vision—1177
MindCube46.7%—

Multilingual Too close to call

Gemma 3 12B: 45.7 (#165), Step 3: 46.3 (#159)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BStep 3
LMArena Non-English13181327
LMArena German13701371
LMArena Russian13351331
LMArena Chinese—1397
LMArena Korean—1269
LMArena Spanish—1371

Instruction Following Step 3 leads

Gemma 3 12B: 68.6 (#186), Step 3: 70.4 (#164)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BStep 3
LMArena Instruction Following12991332

Long Context Too close to call

Gemma 3 12B: 40.0 (#162), Step 3: 40.3 (#157)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BStep 3
LMArena Longer Query13171326

Writing & Preference Step 3 leads

Gemma 3 12B: 47.5 (#209), Step 3: 54.3 (#151)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BStep 3
LMArena Text13341350
LMArena Creative Writing13311321
LMArena Multi-Turn13341341
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1126—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3 12B better than Step 3?

Step 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.5 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 3 12B or Step 3 better for coding?

Step 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 31.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 12B and Step 3 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 12B has 24 scored results on Noometry and Step 3 has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper