Model comparison

Gemma 3 12B vs Olmo 7b Instruct

Gemma 3 12B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.1 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3 12B Google

32.1

Rank #262 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 12B scores higher in 4 categories and Olmo 7b Instruct in 2 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where Gemma 3 12B leads 45.7 to 24.0.

Side by side

Gemma 3 12B and Olmo 7b Instruct specifications
Gemma 3 12BOlmo 7b Instruct
ProviderGoogleAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index32.130.3
Released2025-03-12—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K—
Max output8K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.05—
Output $ / M tokens$0.15—
Results tracked2410

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemma 3 12B leads

Gemma 3 12B: 31.7 (#280), Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Coding12811016
SciCode17.4%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 3 12B: 25.5 (#108), Olmo 7b Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BOlmo 7b Instruct
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard30.4%—

Reasoning Olmo 7b Instruct leads

Gemma 3 12B: 15.7 (#313), Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts1309993
CritPt0%—
Chess Puzzles0%—
DTBench48.8%—
LMCA4.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index123.5—

Math Olmo 7b Instruct leads

Gemma 3 12B: 22.3 (#279), Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Math13071018
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202516.7%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemma 3 12B: 26.5 (#257), Olmo 7b Instruct: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BOlmo 7b Instruct
GPQA Diamond39.5%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate4.4%—
LMArena Expert1248—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 3 12B: —, Olmo 7b Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BOlmo 7b Instruct
MindCube46.7%—

Multilingual Gemma 3 12B leads

Gemma 3 12B: 45.7 (#165), Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Non-English1318977
LMArena Russian1335947
LMArena Chinese—1014
LMArena German1370—

Instruction Following Gemma 3 12B leads

Gemma 3 12B: 68.6 (#186), Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following1299978

Long Context Not comparable

Gemma 3 12B: 40.0 (#162), Olmo 7b Instruct: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1317—

Writing & Preference Gemma 3 12B leads

Gemma 3 12B: 47.5 (#209), Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Text13341032
LMArena Creative Writing1331990
LMArena Multi-Turn13341007
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1126—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3 12B better than Olmo 7b Instruct?

Gemma 3 12B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.1 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 3 12B or Olmo 7b Instruct better for coding?

Gemma 3 12B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.7 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 12B and Olmo 7b Instruct share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 12B has 24 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 7b Instruct has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper