Model comparison
Gemma 3 12B vs MiniMax-M2.5
MiniMax-M2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 12B costs 7.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiniMax-M2.5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.
Google
MiniMaxSummary
- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 12B scores higher in 1 category and MiniMax-M2.5 in 8 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiniMax-M2.5 leads 47.9 to 31.2.
- Gemma 3 12B is cheaper at $0.05 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $1.20 for MiniMax-M2.5.
- MiniMax-M2.5 accepts more context: 205K tokens versus 131K.
Side by side
| Gemma 3 12B | MiniMax-M2.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | |
| Noometry Index | 31.8 | 38.1 |
| Released | 2025-03-12 | 2026-02-12 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 131K | 205K |
| Max output | 8K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.05 | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.15 | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 24 | 33 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiniMax-M2.5 leads
Gemma 3 12B: 31.2 (#276), MiniMax-M2.5: 47.9 (#53)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | MiniMax-M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1281 | 1380 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 75.8% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1386 |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | — | 68.3% |
| SciCode | 17.4% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 618.17 |
Agentic & Tool Use MiniMax-M2.5 leads
Gemma 3 12B: 25.3 (#101), MiniMax-M2.5: 30.2 (#70)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | MiniMax-M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 42.7% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 30.4% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | -23.16 |
Reasoning MiniMax-M2.5 leads
Gemma 3 12B: 15.2 (#307), MiniMax-M2.5: 17.6 (#281)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | MiniMax-M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1309 | 1372 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 123.49 | 146.68 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 4.9% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 55.2% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 16.8% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 63.7% |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| DTBench | 48.8% | — |
| LMCA | 4.5% | — |
Math MiniMax-M2.5 leads
Gemma 3 12B: 21.0 (#273), MiniMax-M2.5: 25.8 (#242)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | MiniMax-M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1307 | 1378 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 16.7% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 4% |
Knowledge MiniMax-M2.5 leads
Gemma 3 12B: 26.5 (#250), MiniMax-M2.5: 38.6 (#132)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | MiniMax-M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 4.4% | 9.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1248 | 1378 |
| GPQA Diamond | 39.5% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 3 12B: —, MiniMax-M2.5: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | MiniMax-M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| MindCube | 46.7% | — |
Multilingual MiniMax-M2.5 leads
Gemma 3 12B: 45.9 (#160), MiniMax-M2.5: 47.3 (#147)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | MiniMax-M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1318 | 1338 |
| LMArena German | 1370 | 1361 |
| LMArena Russian | 1335 | 1359 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1392 |
| LMArena French | — | 1363 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1169 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1232 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1354 |
Instruction Following MiniMax-M2.5 leads
Gemma 3 12B: 68.8 (#179), MiniMax-M2.5: 71.7 (#143)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | MiniMax-M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1299 | 1353 |
Long Context Gemma 3 12B leads
Gemma 3 12B: 40.0 (#157), MiniMax-M2.5: 37.4 (#211)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | MiniMax-M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1317 | 1367 |
| CL-bench | — | 11.4% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 6.3% |
Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2.5 leads
Gemma 3 12B: 47.7 (#205), MiniMax-M2.5: 54.1 (#149)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | MiniMax-M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1334 | 1359 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1331 | 1331 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1126 | 1361 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1334 | 1364 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3 12B better than MiniMax-M2.5?
MiniMax-M2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 12B costs 7.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiniMax-M2.5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 12B or MiniMax-M2.5?
Gemma 3 12B is cheaper. It lists at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; MiniMax-M2.5 lists at $0.30 and $1.20.
Is Gemma 3 12B or MiniMax-M2.5 better for coding?
MiniMax-M2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.9 versus 31.2 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiniMax-M2.5 does, with 205K tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 12B and MiniMax-M2.5 share?
15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 12B has 24 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.5 has 33.