Model comparison

Gemma 3 12B vs Llama 13b

Gemma 3 12B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.1 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3 12B Google

32.1

Rank #262 Confirmed

Llama 13b Meta

24.4

Rank #348 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 12B scores higher in 5 categories and Llama 13b in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 3 12B leads 47.5 to 13.8.

Side by side

Gemma 3 12B and Llama 13b specifications
Gemma 3 12BLlama 13b
ProviderGoogleMeta
Noometry Index32.124.4
Released2025-03-122023-02-24
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K—
Max output8K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.05—
Output $ / M tokens$0.15—
Results tracked2421

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemma 3 12B leads

Gemma 3 12B: 31.7 (#280), Llama 13b: 21.4 (#337)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BLlama 13b
LMArena Coding1281683
SciCode17.4%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 3 12B: 25.5 (#108), Llama 13b: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BLlama 13b
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard30.4%—

Reasoning Gemma 3 12B leads

Gemma 3 12B: 15.7 (#313), Llama 13b: 14.0 (#329)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BLlama 13b
LMArena Hard Prompts1309728
Epoch Capabilities Index123.5100.58
CritPt0%—
Chess Puzzles0%—
DTBench48.8%—
LMCA4.5%—
BIG-Bench Hard—37.9%
HellaSwag—79.2%
LAMBADA—75.2%
PIQA—80.1%
WinoGrande—73%

Math Llama 13b leads

Gemma 3 12B: 22.3 (#279), Llama 13b: 26.7 (#256)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BLlama 13b
LMArena Math1307838
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202516.7%—
GSM8K—20.6%

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemma 3 12B: 26.5 (#257), Llama 13b: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BLlama 13b
GPQA Diamond39.5%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate4.4%—
LMArena Expert1248—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—52.7%
BoolQ—78.7%
MMLU—47.7%
OpenBookQA—56.4%
TriviaQA—77.9%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 3 12B: —, Llama 13b: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BLlama 13b
MindCube46.7%—
ScienceQA—43.3%

Multilingual Gemma 3 12B leads

Gemma 3 12B: 45.7 (#165), Llama 13b: 16.6 (#297)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BLlama 13b
LMArena Non-English1318819
LMArena German1370—
LMArena Russian1335—

Instruction Following Gemma 3 12B leads

Gemma 3 12B: 68.6 (#186), Llama 13b: 36.7 (#305)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BLlama 13b
LMArena Instruction Following1299781

Long Context Not comparable

Gemma 3 12B: 40.0 (#162), Llama 13b: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BLlama 13b
LMArena Longer Query1317—

Writing & Preference Gemma 3 12B leads

Gemma 3 12B: 47.5 (#209), Llama 13b: 13.8 (#312)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BLlama 13b
LMArena Text1334834
LMArena Creative Writing1331794
LMArena Multi-Turn1334753
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1126—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3 12B better than Llama 13b?

Gemma 3 12B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.1 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 3 12B or Llama 13b better for coding?

Gemma 3 12B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.7 versus 21.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 12B and Llama 13b share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 12B has 24 scored results on Noometry and Llama 13b has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper