Model comparison
Gemma 2B vs Wizardlm 13b
Wizardlm 13b is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Google
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 0 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 7 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Wizardlm 13b leads 30.5 to 24.0.
Side by side
| Gemma 2B | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | |
| Noometry Index | 29.6 | 31.4 |
| Released | 2024-02-21 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 23 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Gemma 2B: 29.4 (#305), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | 1035 |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemma 2B: 18.8 (#275), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | 1018 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 94.2 | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |
Math Too close to call
Gemma 2B: 30.0 (#239), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1009 | 1017 |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 2B: —, Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |
Multilingual Wizardlm 13b leads
Gemma 2B: 23.0 (#294), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | 1023 |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | — |
Instruction Following Wizardlm 13b leads
Gemma 2B: 48.5 (#302), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 970 | 1048 |
Long Context Wizardlm 13b leads
Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#291), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | 1054 |
Writing & Preference Wizardlm 13b leads
Gemma 2B: 24.0 (#308), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 987 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | 1047 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2B better than Wizardlm 13b?
Wizardlm 13b is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 2B or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (29.4 vs 30.1); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Wizardlm 13b share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.