Model comparison
Gemma 2B vs Qwen Turbo
Gemma 2B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.6 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 2B leads 30.0 to 15.3.
- Gemma 2B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 2B | Qwen Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 29.6 | 27.1 |
| Released | 2024-02-21 | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.05 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.20 |
| Results tracked | 23 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 2B: 29.4 (#305), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Gemma 2B: 18.8 (#275), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 94.2 | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |
Math Gemma 2B leads
Gemma 2B: 30.0 (#239), Qwen Turbo: 15.3 (#297)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 6.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1009 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.2% |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 2B: —, Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#272)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41.8% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 2B: 23.0 (#294), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 2B: 48.5 (#302), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 970 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#291), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 2B: 24.0 (#308), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 987 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2B better than Qwen Turbo?
Gemma 2B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.6 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Qwen Turbo share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Turbo has 3.