Model comparison

Gemma 2B vs Mixtral 8x22B

Gemma 2B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.6 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 2B Google

29.6

Rank #307 Confirmed

Mixtral 8x22B Mistral AI

27.1

Rank #333 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 2 categories and Mixtral 8x22B in 5 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mixtral 8x22B leads 36.9 to 24.0.

Side by side

Gemma 2B and Mixtral 8x22B specifications
Gemma 2BMixtral 8x22B
ProviderGoogleMistral AI
Noometry Index29.627.1
Released2024-02-212024-04-17
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—64K
Max output—64K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked2334

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemma 2B leads

Gemma 2B: 29.4 (#305), Mixtral 8x22B: 24.2 (#329)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2BMixtral 8x22B
LMArena Coding10101166
HumanEval+20.7%72%
MBPP+34.1%64.3%
WeirdML—3.2%
BigCodeBench Instruct—40.6%
BigCodeBench Complete—50.2%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 2B: —, Mixtral 8x22B: 23.1 (#127)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2BMixtral 8x22B
Cybench—7.5%

Reasoning Mixtral 8x22B leads

Gemma 2B: 18.8 (#275), Mixtral 8x22B: 19.9 (#248)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2BMixtral 8x22B
LMArena Hard Prompts9891150
Epoch Capabilities Index94.2122.03
DTBench—55.1%
BIG-Bench Hard35.2%—
ForecastBench—56.3
HellaSwag71.4%—
PIQA77.3%—
WinoGrande65.4%—

Math Gemma 2B leads

Gemma 2B: 30.0 (#239), Mixtral 8x22B: 22.9 (#275)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2BMixtral 8x22B
LMArena Math10091184
Omni-MATH—16.3%
MATH Level 5—24.2%
GSM8K17.7%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemma 2B: —, Mixtral 8x22B: 15.1 (#293)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2BMixtral 8x22B
MMLU42.3%77.8%
GPQA Diamond—34.1%
MMLU-Pro—46%
GPQA (HELM)—33.4%
LMArena Expert—1113
ARC (AI2) Challenge42.1%—
BoolQ69.4%—
TriviaQA53.2%—

Multilingual Mixtral 8x22B leads

Gemma 2B: 23.0 (#294), Mixtral 8x22B: 32.8 (#255)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2BMixtral 8x22B
LMArena Non-English9581128
LMArena Chinese9861116
LMArena Russian9371158
LMArena French—1166
LMArena German—1141
LMArena Japanese—1037
LMArena Korean—1057
LMArena Spanish—1151

Instruction Following Mixtral 8x22B leads

Gemma 2B: 48.5 (#302), Mixtral 8x22B: 57.7 (#266)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2BMixtral 8x22B
LMArena Instruction Following9701147
IFEval—72.4%

Long Context Mixtral 8x22B leads

Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#291), Mixtral 8x22B: 34.7 (#247)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2BMixtral 8x22B
LMArena Longer Query9811144

Writing & Preference Mixtral 8x22B leads

Gemma 2B: 24.0 (#308), Mixtral 8x22B: 36.9 (#262)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2BMixtral 8x22B
LMArena Text10021162
LMArena Creative Writing9871141
LMArena Multi-Turn9451130
WildBench—71.1%

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 2B better than Mixtral 8x22B?

Gemma 2B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.6 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 2B or Mixtral 8x22B better for coding?

Gemma 2B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 29.4 versus 24.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Mixtral 8x22B share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Mixtral 8x22B has 34.

Related comparisons

Go deeper