Model comparison
Gemma 2B vs Grok Build 0.1
Grok Build 0.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.4 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Grok Build 0.1 leads 43.1 to 29.4.
- Gemma 2B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 2B | Grok Build 0.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | |
| Noometry Index | 29.6 | 36.4 |
| Released | 2024-02-21 | 2026-04-16 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 256K |
| Max output | — | 256K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Results tracked | 23 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok Build 0.1 leads
Gemma 2B: 29.4 (#305), Grok Build 0.1: 43.1 (#91)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 50.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 2B: —, Grok Build 0.1: 22.7 (#129)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| GBAEval | — | 2.4% |
Reasoning Grok Build 0.1 leads
Gemma 2B: 18.8 (#275), Grok Build 0.1: 32.2 (#77)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 9.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 94.2 | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |
Math Not comparable
Gemma 2B: 30.0 (#239), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1009 | — |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 2B: —, Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 2B: 23.0 (#294), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 2B: 48.5 (#302), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 970 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#291), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 2B: 24.0 (#308), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 987 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2B better than Grok Build 0.1?
Grok Build 0.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.4 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 2B or Grok Build 0.1 better for coding?
Grok Build 0.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.1 versus 29.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Grok Build 0.1 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Grok Build 0.1 has 3.