Model comparison

Gemma 2B vs Grok 4.3

Grok 4.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 2B Google

29.6

Rank #307 Confirmed

Grok 4.3 xAI

43.8

Rank #86 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.3 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.3 leads 58.5 to 24.0.
  • Gemma 2B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemma 2B and Grok 4.3 specifications
Gemma 2BGrok 4.3
ProviderGooglexAI
Noometry Index29.643.8
Released2024-02-212026-04-17
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—30K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.25
Output $ / M tokens—$2.50
Results tracked2340

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.3 leads

Gemma 2B: 29.4 (#305), Grok 4.3: 41.6 (#121)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2BGrok 4.3
LMArena Coding10101415
LMArena WebDev—1357
SciCode—47.3%
WeirdML—49.9%
ALE-Bench—944.17
HumanEval+20.7%—
MBPP+34.1%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 2B: —, Grok 4.3: 27.7 (#99)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2BGrok 4.3
GDP.pdf—8%
LMArena Search—1165
Vending-Bench 2—35.26

Reasoning Grok 4.3 leads

Gemma 2B: 18.8 (#275), Grok 4.3: 35.9 (#68)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2BGrok 4.3
LMArena Hard Prompts9891396
Epoch Capabilities Index94.2149.16
NYT Connections (extended)—55.2%
CritPt—8%
Chess Puzzles—25%
DTBench—90.7%
LMCA—38.3%
BIG-Bench Hard35.2%—
ForecastBench—60.3
HellaSwag71.4%—
PIQA77.3%—
WinoGrande65.4%—

Math Grok 4.3 leads

Gemma 2B: 30.0 (#239), Grok 4.3: 46.0 (#74)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2BGrok 4.3
LMArena Math10091388
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—42.8%
FrontierMath Tier 4—14.6%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—93.3%
ProofBench—11%
GSM8K17.7%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemma 2B: —, Grok 4.3: 52.5 (#62)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2BGrok 4.3
GPQA Diamond—88.8%
SimpleQA Verified—33.2%
LMArena Expert—1385
ARC (AI2) Challenge42.1%—
BoolQ69.4%—
MMLU42.3%—
TriviaQA53.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 2B: —, Grok 4.3: 31.6 (#104)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2BGrok 4.3
LMArena Vision—1229
Blueprint-Bench 2—0%

Multilingual Grok 4.3 leads

Gemma 2B: 23.0 (#294), Grok 4.3: 50.5 (#120)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2BGrok 4.3
LMArena Non-English9581385
LMArena Chinese9861422
LMArena Russian9371399
LMArena French—1412
LMArena German—1395
LMArena Japanese—1379
LMArena Korean—1356
LMArena Spanish—1398

Instruction Following Grok 4.3 leads

Gemma 2B: 48.5 (#302), Grok 4.3: 72.1 (#140)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2BGrok 4.3
LMArena Instruction Following9701366

Long Context Grok 4.3 leads

Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#291), Grok 4.3: 42.5 (#123)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2BGrok 4.3
LMArena Longer Query9811393

Writing & Preference Grok 4.3 leads

Gemma 2B: 24.0 (#308), Grok 4.3: 58.5 (#118)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2BGrok 4.3
LMArena Text10021397
LMArena Creative Writing9871380
LMArena Multi-Turn9451406
EQ-Bench 4—1075

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 2B better than Grok 4.3?

Grok 4.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 2B or Grok 4.3 better for coding?

Grok 4.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.6 versus 29.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Grok 4.3 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.3 has 40.

Related comparisons

Go deeper