Model comparison
Gemma 2B vs GLM-5V-Turbo
GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-5V-Turbo in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-5V-Turbo leads 62.5 to 24.0.
- Gemma 2B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 2B | GLM-5V-Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | |
| Noometry Index | 29.6 | 43.8 |
| Released | 2024-02-21 | 2026-04-01 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 200K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $4 |
| Results tracked | 23 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-5V-Turbo leads
Gemma 2B: 29.4 (#305), GLM-5V-Turbo: 42.1 (#111)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | 1466 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1401 |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |
Reasoning GLM-5V-Turbo leads
Gemma 2B: 18.8 (#275), GLM-5V-Turbo: 29.7 (#89)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | 1443 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 94.2 | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |
Math GLM-5V-Turbo leads
Gemma 2B: 30.0 (#239), GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.4 (#106)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1009 | 1441 |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 2B: —, GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.6 (#117)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1452 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 2B: —, GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.9 (#42)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1264 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1416 |
Multilingual GLM-5V-Turbo leads
Gemma 2B: 23.0 (#294), GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.0 (#73)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | 1420 |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | 1488 |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | 1431 |
| LMArena French | — | 1444 |
| LMArena German | — | 1423 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1396 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1450 |
Instruction Following GLM-5V-Turbo leads
Gemma 2B: 48.5 (#302), GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.0 (#80)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 970 | 1423 |
Long Context GLM-5V-Turbo leads
Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#291), GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#80)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | 1438 |
Writing & Preference GLM-5V-Turbo leads
Gemma 2B: 24.0 (#308), GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.5 (#73)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | 1437 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 987 | 1416 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | 1432 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2B better than GLM-5V-Turbo?
GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 2B or GLM-5V-Turbo better for coding?
GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.1 versus 29.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and GLM-5V-Turbo share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and GLM-5V-Turbo has 19.