Model comparison

Gemma 2 9B vs Yi-34B

Yi-34B is the stronger model overall, scoring 27.8 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 22 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 2 9B Google

25.9

Rank #341 Confirmed

Yi-34B 01.AI

27.8

Rank #329 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 22 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 9B scores higher in 4 categories and Yi-34B in 4 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Yi-34B leads 21.6 to 9.9.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 21% for Gemma 2 9B and 5.1% for Yi-34B.

Side by side

Gemma 2 9B and Yi-34B specifications
Gemma 2 9BYi-34B
ProviderGoogle01.AI
Noometry Index25.927.8
Released2024-06-242023-11-02
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3523

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Yi-34B leads

Gemma 2 9B: 29.4 (#304), Yi-34B: 32.3 (#274)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BYi-34B
LMArena Coding11731112
BigCodeBench Instruct34.7%—
LiveBench Coding22.5%—
BigCodeBench Complete40.6%—

Reasoning Yi-34B leads

Gemma 2 9B: 15.9 (#309), Yi-34B: 21.2 (#226)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BYi-34B
LMArena Hard Prompts11711104
Epoch Capabilities Index119.83117.39
LiveBench Reasoning15.2%—
LiveBench Data Analysis36.4%—
BIG-Bench Hard—71.7%
LiveBench28.7%—
PIQA83.7%—

Math Yi-34B leads

Gemma 2 9B: 9.9 (#318), Yi-34B: 21.6 (#282)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BYi-34B
LMArena Math11831114
MATH Level 521%5.1%
GSM8K84.9%76%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20250.6%—
LiveBench Math19.8%—

Knowledge Gemma 2 9B leads

Gemma 2 9B: 9.7 (#305), Yi-34B: 7.5 (#309)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BYi-34B
GPQA Diamond27.5%14.7%
LMArena Expert11471061
MMLU72.1%76.3%
BoolQ85.7%—

Multilingual Gemma 2 9B leads

Gemma 2 9B: 36.6 (#238), Yi-34B: 29.7 (#264)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BYi-34B
LMArena Non-English11881079
LMArena Chinese11851176
LMArena French11901081
LMArena German11861042
LMArena Japanese1144993
LMArena Korean1137959
LMArena Russian12001050
LMArena Spanish12001070

Instruction Following Gemma 2 9B leads

Gemma 2 9B: 57.6 (#269), Yi-34B: 56.2 (#274)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BYi-34B
LMArena Instruction Following11781091
LiveBench Instruction Following52.6%—

Long Context Gemma 2 9B leads

Gemma 2 9B: 36.3 (#233), Yi-34B: 33.2 (#264)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BYi-34B
LMArena Longer Query11971094

Writing & Preference Yi-34B leads

Gemma 2 9B: 32.1 (#281), Yi-34B: 34.1 (#273)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BYi-34B
LMArena Text12071129
LMArena Creative Writing12061108
LMArena Multi-Turn11931113
EQ-Bench Creative Writing841—
LiveBench Language25.5%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 2 9B better than Yi-34B?

Yi-34B is the stronger model overall, scoring 27.8 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 2 9B or Yi-34B better for coding?

Yi-34B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.3 versus 29.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 9B and Yi-34B share?

22 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 9B has 35 scored results on Noometry and Yi-34B has 23.

Related comparisons

Go deeper