Model comparison

Gemma 2 9B vs Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 27.9 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 25 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 2 9B Google

25.9

Rank #341 Confirmed

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct Microsoft

27.9

Rank #328 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 25 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 9B scores higher in 6 categories and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct leads 28.5 to 9.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is LiveBench Language: 25.5% for Gemma 2 9B and 9.2% for Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct.

Side by side

Gemma 2 9B and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct specifications
Gemma 2 9BPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
ProviderGoogleMicrosoft
Noometry Index25.927.9
Released2024-06-242024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3535

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemma 2 9B leads

Gemma 2 9B: 29.4 (#304), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#323)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LiveBench Coding22.5%15.5%
LMArena Coding11731093
BigCodeBench Instruct34.7%—
BigCodeBench Complete40.6%—
HumanEval+—59.1%
MBPP+—54.2%

Reasoning Gemma 2 9B leads

Gemma 2 9B: 15.9 (#309), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 14.1 (#328)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LiveBench Reasoning15.2%26.8%
LMArena Hard Prompts11711072
LiveBench Data Analysis36.4%34.7%
LiveBench28.7%22.4%
Chess Puzzles—0%
Adversarial NLI—52.8%
BIG-Bench Hard—71.7%
Epoch Capabilities Index119.83—
HellaSwag—76.7%
PIQA83.7%—
WinoGrande—70.8%

Math Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct leads

Gemma 2 9B: 9.9 (#318), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#257)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LiveBench Math19.8%15.7%
LMArena Math11831111
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20250.6%—
MATH Level 521%—
GSM8K84.9%—

Knowledge Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct leads

Gemma 2 9B: 9.7 (#305), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 28.5 (#246)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Expert11471045
MMLU72.1%68.8%
GPQA Diamond27.5%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—84.9%
BoolQ85.7%—
OpenBookQA—88%
TriviaQA—64%

Multilingual Gemma 2 9B leads

Gemma 2 9B: 36.6 (#238), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.3 (#280)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Non-English11881021
LMArena Chinese11851021
LMArena French11901076
LMArena German11861044
LMArena Japanese1144935
LMArena Korean1137905
LMArena Russian12001022
LMArena Spanish12001085

Instruction Following Gemma 2 9B leads

Gemma 2 9B: 57.6 (#269), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 47.7 (#303)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LiveBench Instruction Following52.6%39.1%
LMArena Instruction Following11781053

Long Context Gemma 2 9B leads

Gemma 2 9B: 36.3 (#233), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 31.7 (#276)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query11971044

Writing & Preference Gemma 2 9B leads

Gemma 2 9B: 32.1 (#281), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 27.6 (#300)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Text12071073
LMArena Creative Writing12061037
LMArena Multi-Turn11931018
LiveBench Language25.5%9.2%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing841—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 2 9B better than Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct?

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 27.9 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 2 9B or Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct better for coding?

Gemma 2 9B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 29.4 versus 26.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 9B and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct share?

25 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 9B has 35 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct has 35.

Related comparisons

Go deeper