Model comparison
Gemma 2 9B vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
OLMo 2 Furious 13B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.2 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.
Google
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 9B scores higher in 2 categories and OLMo 2 Furious 13B in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads 21.3 to 9.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is LiveBench Data Analysis: 36.4% for Gemma 2 9B and 20.6% for OLMo 2 Furious 13B.
Side by side
| Gemma 2 9B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | |
| Noometry Index | 25.7 | 29.2 |
| Released | 2024-06-24 | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 35 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Gemma 2 9B: 29.0 (#299), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.1 (#309)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | 22.5% | 10.4% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 34.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1174 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 40.6% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemma 2 9B: 15.3 (#306), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 14.8 (#312)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 15.2% | 16.3% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 36.4% | 20.6% |
| LiveBench | 28.7% | 22.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1172 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.78 | — |
| PIQA | 83.7% | — |
Math OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
Gemma 2 9B: 9.3 (#312), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 21.3 (#270)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 19.8% | 13.6% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.6% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1183 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 21% | — |
| GSM8K | 84.9% | — |
Knowledge OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
Gemma 2 9B: 9.7 (#300), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.0 (#278)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 27.5% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1147 | — |
| BoolQ | 85.7% | — |
| MMLU | 72.1% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 2 9B: 36.8 (#233), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1188 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1185 | — |
| LMArena French | 1189 | — |
| LMArena German | 1186 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1144 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1137 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1200 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1200 | — |
Instruction Following OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
Gemma 2 9B: 57.8 (#264), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 61.1 (#243)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 52.6% | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1178 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 2 9B: 36.3 (#228), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1197 | — |
Writing & Preference OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
Gemma 2 9B: 32.3 (#276), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 43.0 (#226)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Language | 25.5% | 11.2% |
| LMArena Text | 1207 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1206 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 841 | — |
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1193 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2 9B better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
OLMo 2 Furious 13B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.2 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 2 9B or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (29.0 vs 28.1); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 9B and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 9B has 35 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.