Model comparison
Mistral Nemo vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
OLMo 2 Furious 13B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.2 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads 43.0 to 28.6.
Side by side
| Mistral Nemo | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 25.9 | 29.2 |
| Released | 2024-07-01 | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Results tracked | 10 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: —, OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.1 (#309)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: 23.3 (#118), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 27.6% | — |
| BALROG | 17.6% | — |
Reasoning Mistral Nemo leads
Mistral Nemo: 19.9 (#230), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 14.8 (#312)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| DTBench | 48.6% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.63 | — |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |
| PIQA | 83.5% | — |
Math Mistral Nemo leads
Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#263), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 21.3 (#270)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
| MATH Level 5 | 10.8% | — |
| GSM8K | 84.2% | — |
Knowledge OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#293), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.0 (#278)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 29.9% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
| BoolQ | 82.5% | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: —, OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 61.1 (#243)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
Writing & Preference OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
Mistral Nemo: 28.6 (#291), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 43.0 (#226)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 881 | — |
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mistral Nemo better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
OLMo 2 Furious 13B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.2 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Mistral Nemo and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Nemo has 10 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.