Model comparison

Gemma 2 9B vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 2 9B Google

25.9

Rank #341 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 9B scores higher in 2 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads 26.8 to 9.9.

Side by side

Gemma 2 9B and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct specifications
Gemma 2 9BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
ProviderGoogleAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index25.932.7
Released2024-06-24—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3516

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Gemma 2 9B: 29.4 (#304), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Coding11731210
BigCodeBench Instruct34.7%—
LiveBench Coding22.5%—
BigCodeBench Complete40.6%—

Reasoning Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Gemma 2 9B: 15.9 (#309), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts11711208
LiveBench Reasoning15.2%—
LiveBench Data Analysis36.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index119.83—
LiveBench28.7%—
PIQA83.7%—

Math Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Gemma 2 9B: 9.9 (#318), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Math11831208
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20250.6%—
Omni-MATH—16.1%
LiveBench Math19.8%—
MATH Level 521%—
GSM8K84.9%—

Knowledge Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Gemma 2 9B: 9.7 (#305), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
GPQA Diamond27.5%—
MMLU-Pro—41.4%
GPQA (HELM)—28.7%
LMArena Expert1147—
BoolQ85.7%—
MMLU72.1%—

Multilingual Gemma 2 9B leads

Gemma 2 9B: 36.6 (#238), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Non-English11881160
LMArena Chinese11851192
LMArena Russian12001187
LMArena French1190—
LMArena German1186—
LMArena Japanese1144—
LMArena Korean1137—
LMArena Spanish1200—

Instruction Following Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Gemma 2 9B: 57.6 (#269), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following11781186
LiveBench Instruction Following52.6%—
IFEval—78%

Long Context Too close to call

Gemma 2 9B: 36.3 (#233), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query11971194

Writing & Preference Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Gemma 2 9B: 32.1 (#281), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Text12071218
LMArena Creative Writing12061199
LMArena Multi-Turn11931221
EQ-Bench Creative Writing841—
WildBench—73.4%
LiveBench Language25.5%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 2 9B better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 2 9B or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.2 versus 29.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 9B and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 9B has 35 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper