Model comparison
Gemma 2 9B vs MiniMax-M2
MiniMax-M2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.
Google
MiniMaxSummary
- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 9B scores higher in 0 categories and MiniMax-M2 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where MiniMax-M2 leads 37.3 to 9.9.
Side by side
| Gemma 2 9B | MiniMax-M2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | |
| Noometry Index | 25.9 | 37.4 |
| Released | 2024-06-24 | 2025-10-27 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 205K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 35 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiniMax-M2 leads
Gemma 2 9B: 29.4 (#304), MiniMax-M2: 39.3 (#159)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1173 | 1370 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 61% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1297 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 34.7% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 22.5% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 40.6% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 2 9B: —, MiniMax-M2: 25.1 (#109)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 30% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 160.6 |
Reasoning MiniMax-M2 leads
Gemma 2 9B: 15.9 (#309), MiniMax-M2: 19.4 (#258)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1171 | 1357 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 57.8% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 14.8% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 15.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 36.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.83 | — |
| LiveBench | 28.7% | — |
| PIQA | 83.7% | — |
Math MiniMax-M2 leads
Gemma 2 9B: 9.9 (#318), MiniMax-M2: 37.3 (#160)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1183 | 1352 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 19.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 21% | — |
| GSM8K | 84.9% | — |
Knowledge MiniMax-M2 leads
Gemma 2 9B: 9.7 (#305), MiniMax-M2: 37.0 (#163)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1147 | 1337 |
| GPQA Diamond | 27.5% | — |
| BoolQ | 85.7% | — |
| MMLU | 72.1% | — |
Multilingual MiniMax-M2 leads
Gemma 2 9B: 36.6 (#238), MiniMax-M2: 45.3 (#171)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1188 | 1313 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1185 | 1366 |
| LMArena French | 1190 | 1335 |
| LMArena German | 1186 | 1355 |
| LMArena Russian | 1200 | 1331 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1200 | 1326 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1144 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1137 | — |
Instruction Following MiniMax-M2 leads
Gemma 2 9B: 57.6 (#269), MiniMax-M2: 70.2 (#166)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1178 | 1328 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 52.6% | — |
Long Context MiniMax-M2 leads
Gemma 2 9B: 36.3 (#233), MiniMax-M2: 40.5 (#153)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1197 | 1331 |
Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2 leads
Gemma 2 9B: 32.1 (#281), MiniMax-M2: 53.0 (#162)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1207 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1206 | 1286 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1193 | 1361 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 841 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 25.5% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2 9B better than MiniMax-M2?
MiniMax-M2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 2 9B or MiniMax-M2 better for coding?
MiniMax-M2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.3 versus 29.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 9B and MiniMax-M2 share?
15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 9B has 35 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2 has 21.