Model comparison
Gemma 2 9B vs MiMo-V2-Flash
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 9B scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 39.1 to 9.7.
Side by side
| Gemma 2 9B | MiMo-V2-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | |
| Noometry Index | 25.7 | 40.8 |
| Released | 2024-06-24 | 2025-12-16 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 35 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Gemma 2 9B: 29.0 (#299), MiMo-V2-Flash: 35.8 (#205)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1174 | 1443 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1330 |
| SciCode | — | 25.9% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 34.7% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 22.5% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 40.6% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 737.95 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Gemma 2 9B: 15.3 (#306), MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.1 (#155)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1172 | 1420 |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 15.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 36.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.78 | — |
| LiveBench | 28.7% | — |
| PIQA | 83.7% | — |
Math MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Gemma 2 9B: 9.3 (#312), MiMo-V2-Flash: 35.6 (#141)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1183 | 1396 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 19.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 21% | — |
| GSM8K | 84.9% | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Gemma 2 9B: 9.7 (#300), MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.1 (#126)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1147 | 1425 |
| GPQA Diamond | 27.5% | — |
| BoolQ | 85.7% | — |
| MMLU | 72.1% | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Gemma 2 9B: 36.8 (#233), MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.1 (#109)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1188 | 1391 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1185 | 1463 |
| LMArena French | 1189 | 1429 |
| LMArena German | 1186 | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1144 | 1324 |
| LMArena Korean | 1137 | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | 1200 | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1200 | 1420 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Gemma 2 9B: 57.8 (#264), MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.7 (#115)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1178 | 1392 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 52.6% | — |
Long Context MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Gemma 2 9B: 36.3 (#228), MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#106)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1197 | 1409 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Gemma 2 9B: 32.3 (#276), MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.9 (#101)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1207 | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1206 | 1375 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1193 | 1404 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 841 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 25.5% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2 9B better than MiMo-V2-Flash?
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 2 9B or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.8 versus 29.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 9B and MiMo-V2-Flash share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 9B has 35 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.