Model comparison

Claude 3 Haiku vs MiMo-V2-Flash

MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Haiku Anthropic

25.9

Rank #340 Confirmed

MiMo-V2-Flash Xiaomi

41.3

Rank #138 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Haiku scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 59.7 to 29.7.
  • MiMo-V2-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3 Haiku and MiMo-V2-Flash specifications
Claude 3 HaikuMiMo-V2-Flash
ProviderAnthropicXiaomi
Noometry Index25.941.3
Released2024-03-072025-12-16
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.14
Output $ / M tokens—$0.28
Results tracked3721

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 26.4 (#325), MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Coding11991443
LMArena WebDev—1330
SciCode—25.9%
WeirdML9.8%—
BigCodeBench Instruct39.4%—
BigCodeBench Complete50.1%—
CadEval12%—
ALE-Bench—737.95
HumanEval+68.9%—
MBPP+68.8%—

Reasoning MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 16.3 (#307), MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts11741420
Kagi LLM Benchmark34.2%—
CritPt—0%
DTBench50.1%—
LMCA8.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index118.35—
ForecastBench53.2—
WinoGrande74.2%—

Math MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 9.8 (#319), MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Math11881396
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.8%—
MATH Level 514.9%—

Knowledge MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 17.3 (#285), MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Expert11481425
GPQA Diamond36.3%—
Confabulations34.2%—
MMLU73.8%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 23.6 (#128), MiMo-V2-Flash: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Vision950—
ScienceQA72%—

Multilingual MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 36.0 (#243), MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Non-English11781392
LMArena Chinese11551462
LMArena French11951429
LMArena German11741395
LMArena Japanese11021325
LMArena Korean11091358
LMArena Russian12041387
LMArena Spanish11661420

Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 61.3 (#247), MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following11731392

Long Context MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 36.1 (#237), MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Longer Query11901409

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 29.7 (#291), MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Text11951411
LMArena Creative Writing11571375
LMArena Multi-Turn11901404
EQ-Bench Creative Writing717—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Haiku better than MiMo-V2-Flash?

MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Haiku or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.1 versus 26.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Haiku and MiMo-V2-Flash share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Haiku has 37 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper