Model comparison
Gemma 2 9B vs Hunyuan Vision 1.5
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.
Google
TencentSummary
- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 9B scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads 60.1 to 32.1.
- Gemma 2 9B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 2 9B | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | |
| Noometry Index | 25.9 | 43.1 |
| Released | 2024-06-24 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 35 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Gemma 2 9B: 29.4 (#304), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.8 (#119)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1173 | 1418 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 34.7% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 22.5% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 40.6% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Gemma 2 9B: 15.9 (#309), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 28.9 (#97)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1171 | 1416 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 15.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 36.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.83 | — |
| LiveBench | 28.7% | — |
| PIQA | 83.7% | — |
Math Not comparable
Gemma 2 9B: 9.9 (#318), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 19.8% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1183 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 21% | — |
| GSM8K | 84.9% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 2 9B: 9.7 (#305), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 27.5% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1147 | — |
| BoolQ | 85.7% | — |
| MMLU | 72.1% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 2 9B: —, Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.7 (#84)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1180 |
Multilingual Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Gemma 2 9B: 36.6 (#238), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.3 (#125)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1188 | 1382 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1185 | — |
| LMArena French | 1190 | — |
| LMArena German | 1186 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1144 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1137 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1200 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1200 | — |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Gemma 2 9B: 57.6 (#269), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.7 (#117)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1178 | 1397 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 52.6% | — |
Long Context Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Gemma 2 9B: 36.3 (#233), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#115)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1197 | 1404 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Gemma 2 9B: 32.1 (#281), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.1 (#100)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1207 | 1405 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1206 | 1388 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1193 | 1422 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 841 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 25.5% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2 9B better than Hunyuan Vision 1.5?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 2 9B or Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better for coding?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 29.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 9B and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 share?
8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 9B has 35 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9.