Model comparison

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus vs Gemma 2 9B

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.6 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus DeepSeek

42.6

Rank #96 Confirmed

Gemma 2 9B Google

25.7

Rank #334 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus scores higher in 7 categories and Gemma 2 9B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads 61.3 to 32.3.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus and Gemma 2 9B specifications
DeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusGemma 2 9B
ProviderDeepSeekGoogle
Noometry Index42.625.7
Released2025-09-222024-06-24
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window164K—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.30—
Output $ / M tokens$1—
Results tracked1635

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 41.5 (#114), Gemma 2 9B: 29.0 (#299)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusGemma 2 9B
LMArena Coding14261174
SciCode40.6%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—34.7%
LiveBench Coding—22.5%
BigCodeBench Complete—40.6%
ALE-Bench745.17—

Reasoning DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 25.7 (#126), Gemma 2 9B: 15.3 (#306)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusGemma 2 9B
LMArena Hard Prompts14271172
Kagi LLM Benchmark57.4%—
CritPt1.7%—
LiveBench Reasoning—15.2%
DTBench81.3%—
LiveBench Data Analysis—36.4%
LMCA28.6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index—119.78
LiveBench—28.7%
PIQA—83.7%

Math DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 35.7 (#138), Gemma 2 9B: 9.3 (#312)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusGemma 2 9B
LMArena Math14021183
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—0.6%
LiveBench Math—19.8%
MATH Level 5—21%
GSM8K—84.9%

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: —, Gemma 2 9B: 9.7 (#300)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusGemma 2 9B
GPQA Diamond—27.5%
LMArena Expert—1147
BoolQ—85.7%
MMLU—72.1%

Multilingual DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 52.3 (#87), Gemma 2 9B: 36.8 (#233)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusGemma 2 9B
LMArena Non-English14071188
LMArena Russian14341200
LMArena Chinese—1185
LMArena French—1189
LMArena German—1186
LMArena Japanese—1144
LMArena Korean—1137
LMArena Spanish—1200

Instruction Following DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 74.4 (#96), Gemma 2 9B: 57.8 (#264)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusGemma 2 9B
LMArena Instruction Following14061178
LiveBench Instruction Following—52.6%

Long Context DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 43.5 (#88), Gemma 2 9B: 36.3 (#228)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusGemma 2 9B
LMArena Longer Query14261197

Writing & Preference DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 61.3 (#87), Gemma 2 9B: 32.3 (#276)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusGemma 2 9B
LMArena Text14201207
LMArena Creative Writing14041206
LMArena Multi-Turn14111193
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—841
LiveBench Language—25.5%

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus better than Gemma 2 9B?

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.6 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus or Gemma 2 9B better for coding?

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.5 versus 29.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus and Gemma 2 9B share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus has 16 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 2 9B has 35.

Related comparisons

Go deeper