Model comparison
Gemma 2 9B vs Hunyuan Turbo 0110
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.0 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Google
TencentSummary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 9B scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads 32.9 to 9.3.
- Gemma 2 9B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 2 9B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | |
| Noometry Index | 25.7 | 39.0 |
| Released | 2024-06-24 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 35 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Gemma 2 9B: 29.0 (#299), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.0 (#168)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1174 | 1320 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 34.7% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 22.5% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 40.6% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Gemma 2 9B: 15.3 (#306), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 25.0 (#135)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1172 | 1308 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 15.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 36.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.78 | — |
| LiveBench | 28.7% | — |
| PIQA | 83.7% | — |
Math Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Gemma 2 9B: 9.3 (#312), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 32.9 (#180)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1183 | 1273 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 19.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 21% | — |
| GSM8K | 84.9% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 2 9B: 9.7 (#300), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 27.5% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1147 | — |
| BoolQ | 85.7% | — |
| MMLU | 72.1% | — |
Multilingual Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Gemma 2 9B: 36.8 (#233), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.5 (#178)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1188 | 1285 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1185 | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | 1200 | 1305 |
| LMArena French | 1189 | — |
| LMArena German | 1186 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1144 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1137 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1200 | — |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Gemma 2 9B: 57.8 (#264), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.7 (#190)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1178 | 1279 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 52.6% | — |
Long Context Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Gemma 2 9B: 36.3 (#228), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#163)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1197 | 1309 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Gemma 2 9B: 32.3 (#276), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.4 (#176)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1207 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1206 | 1269 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1193 | 1303 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 841 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 25.5% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2 9B better than Hunyuan Turbo 0110?
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.0 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 2 9B or Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better for coding?
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.0 versus 29.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 9B and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 9B has 35 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11.