Model comparison

Gemma 2 9B vs Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 2 9B Google

25.9

Rank #341 Confirmed

Grok 4 Fast xAI

39.4

Rank #167 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 9B scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4 Fast in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Grok 4 Fast leads 38.9 to 9.9.
  • Gemma 2 9B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemma 2 9B and Grok 4 Fast specifications
Gemma 2 9BGrok 4 Fast
ProviderGooglexAI
Noometry Index25.939.4
Released2024-06-242025-09-19
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3530

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4 Fast leads

Gemma 2 9B: 29.4 (#304), Grok 4 Fast: 32.5 (#271)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BGrok 4 Fast
LMArena Coding11731429
LMArena WebDev—1159
WeirdML—42.9%
BigCodeBench Instruct34.7%—
LiveBench Coding22.5%—
BigCodeBench Complete40.6%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 2 9B: —, Grok 4 Fast: 29.5 (#86)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BGrok 4 Fast
τ²-bench Banking—15.7%
Cybench—30%
LMArena Search—1171

Reasoning Grok 4 Fast leads

Gemma 2 9B: 15.9 (#309), Grok 4 Fast: 22.2 (#201)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BGrok 4 Fast
LMArena Hard Prompts11711412
Epoch Capabilities Index119.83144.2
ARC-AGI-2—5.3%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—66.1%
ARC-AGI-1—48.5%
LiveBench Reasoning15.2%—
DTBench—82.7%
LiveBench Data Analysis36.4%—
ForecastBench—60.5
LiveBench28.7%—
PIQA83.7%—

Math Grok 4 Fast leads

Gemma 2 9B: 9.9 (#318), Grok 4 Fast: 38.9 (#123)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BGrok 4 Fast
LMArena Math11831419
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20250.6%—
LiveBench Math19.8%—
MATH Level 521%—
GSM8K84.9%—

Knowledge Grok 4 Fast leads

Gemma 2 9B: 9.7 (#305), Grok 4 Fast: 32.0 (#214)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BGrok 4 Fast
LMArena Expert11471411
GPQA Diamond27.5%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—19.7%
BoolQ85.7%—
MMLU72.1%—

Multilingual Grok 4 Fast leads

Gemma 2 9B: 36.6 (#238), Grok 4 Fast: 51.3 (#111)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BGrok 4 Fast
LMArena Non-English11881396
LMArena Chinese11851457
LMArena French11901431
LMArena German11861383
LMArena Japanese11441352
LMArena Korean11371357
LMArena Russian12001389
LMArena Spanish12001415

Instruction Following Grok 4 Fast leads

Gemma 2 9B: 57.6 (#269), Grok 4 Fast: 73.2 (#121)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BGrok 4 Fast
LMArena Instruction Following11781387
LiveBench Instruction Following52.6%—

Long Context Grok 4 Fast leads

Gemma 2 9B: 36.3 (#233), Grok 4 Fast: 63.2 (#3)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BGrok 4 Fast
LMArena Longer Query11971415
Fiction.LiveBench—94.4%

Writing & Preference Grok 4 Fast leads

Gemma 2 9B: 32.1 (#281), Grok 4 Fast: 60.0 (#102)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BGrok 4 Fast
LMArena Text12071407
LMArena Creative Writing12061387
LMArena Multi-Turn11931414
EQ-Bench Creative Writing841—
LiveBench Language25.5%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 2 9B better than Grok 4 Fast?

Grok 4 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 2 9B or Grok 4 Fast better for coding?

Grok 4 Fast scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.5 versus 29.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 9B and Grok 4 Fast share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 9B has 35 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4 Fast has 30.

Related comparisons

Go deeper