Model comparison

Gemma 2 9B vs Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 2 9B Google

25.9

Rank #341 Confirmed

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 Tencent

38.6

Rank #184 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 9B scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads 35.8 to 9.9.
  • Gemma 2 9B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemma 2 9B and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 specifications
Gemma 2 9BHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
ProviderGoogleTencent
Noometry Index25.938.6
Released2024-06-24—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3512

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Gemma 2 9B: 29.4 (#304), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 38.2 (#181)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Coding11731307
BigCodeBench Instruct34.7%—
LiveBench Coding22.5%—
BigCodeBench Complete40.6%—

Reasoning Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Gemma 2 9B: 15.9 (#309), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 25.5 (#148)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Hard Prompts11711286
LiveBench Reasoning15.2%—
LiveBench Data Analysis36.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index119.83—
LiveBench28.7%—
PIQA83.7%—

Math Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Gemma 2 9B: 9.9 (#318), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.8 (#178)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Math11831281
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20250.6%—
LiveBench Math19.8%—
MATH Level 521%—
GSM8K84.9%—

Knowledge Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Gemma 2 9B: 9.7 (#305), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.1 (#188)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Expert11471276
GPQA Diamond27.5%—
BoolQ85.7%—
MMLU72.1%—

Multilingual Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Gemma 2 9B: 36.6 (#238), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.0 (#200)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Non-English11881265
LMArena Chinese11851346
LMArena Russian12001266
LMArena French1190—
LMArena German1186—
LMArena Japanese1144—
LMArena Korean1137—
LMArena Spanish1200—

Instruction Following Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Gemma 2 9B: 57.6 (#269), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.3 (#197)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Instruction Following11781277
LiveBench Instruction Following52.6%—

Long Context Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Gemma 2 9B: 36.3 (#233), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#149)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Longer Query11971341

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Gemma 2 9B: 32.1 (#281), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.7 (#197)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Text12071288
LMArena Creative Writing12061264
LMArena Multi-Turn11931284
EQ-Bench Creative Writing841—
LiveBench Language25.5%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 2 9B better than Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10?

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 2 9B or Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better for coding?

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.2 versus 29.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 9B and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 9B has 35 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper