Model comparison
Gemma 2 9B vs Qwen3.6 Flash
Qwen3.6 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 9B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 Flash in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 Flash leads 42.1 to 9.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 0.6% for Gemma 2 9B and 84.4% for Qwen3.6 Flash.
- Gemma 2 9B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 2 9B | Qwen3.6 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 25.9 | 38.8 |
| Released | 2024-06-24 | 2026-04-27 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.19 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.13 |
| Results tracked | 35 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 2 9B: 29.4 (#304), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 34.7% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 22.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1173 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 40.6% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 326.4 |
Reasoning Qwen3.6 Flash leads
Gemma 2 9B: 15.9 (#309), Qwen3.6 Flash: 29.0 (#96)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.83 | 143.26 |
| SimpleBench | — | 35.2% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 15.2% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1171 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 18% |
| DTBench | — | 77.1% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 36.4% | — |
| LMCA | — | 31% |
| LiveBench | 28.7% | — |
| PIQA | 83.7% | — |
Math Qwen3.6 Flash leads
Gemma 2 9B: 9.9 (#318), Qwen3.6 Flash: 39.0 (#117)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.6% | 84.4% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 22.5% |
| LiveBench Math | 19.8% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1183 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 21% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 10.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |
| GSM8K | 84.9% | — |
Knowledge Qwen3.6 Flash leads
Gemma 2 9B: 9.7 (#305), Qwen3.6 Flash: 42.1 (#100)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 27.5% | 83.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 15.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1147 | — |
| BoolQ | 85.7% | — |
| MMLU | 72.1% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 2 9B: 36.6 (#238), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1188 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1185 | — |
| LMArena French | 1190 | — |
| LMArena German | 1186 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1144 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1137 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1200 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1200 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 2 9B: 57.6 (#269), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 52.6% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1178 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 2 9B: 36.3 (#233), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1197 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 2 9B: 32.1 (#281), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1207 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1206 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 841 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1193 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 25.5% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2 9B better than Qwen3.6 Flash?
Qwen3.6 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 9B and Qwen3.6 Flash share?
3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 9B has 35 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Flash has 13.