Model comparison
Gemma 2 2b IT vs Yi-1.5-34B
Gemma 2 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.1 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher in 2 categories and Yi-1.5-34B in 6 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemma 2 2b IT leads 29.9 to 14.8.
Side by side
| Gemma 2 2b IT | Yi-1.5-34B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | 01.AI | |
| Noometry Index | 33.1 | 30.6 |
| Released | — | 2024-05-13 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#273), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.4 (#272)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | 1169 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 33.9% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 43.8% |
Reasoning Yi-1.5-34B leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 21.4 (#224), Yi-1.5-34B: 22.5 (#191)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1160 |
Math Gemma 2 2b IT leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.6 (#212), Yi-1.5-34B: 27.5 (#249)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1135 | 1182 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 25.5% |
Knowledge Gemma 2 2b IT leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.9 (#231), Yi-1.5-34B: 14.8 (#295)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | 1144 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 32% |
Multilingual Too close to call
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#257), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.3 (#256)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | 1121 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1213 |
| LMArena French | 1157 | 1156 |
| LMArena German | 1114 | 1111 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | 1021 |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | 1005 |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | 1091 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | 1121 |
Instruction Following Yi-1.5-34B leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 57.8 (#263), Yi-1.5-34B: 59.2 (#257)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | 1139 |
Long Context Too close to call
Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.3 (#250), Yi-1.5-34B: 34.6 (#248)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | 1143 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.5 (#263), Yi-1.5-34B: 37.4 (#257)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | 1173 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | 1135 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | 1153 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than Yi-1.5-34B?
Gemma 2 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.1 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 2 2b IT or Yi-1.5-34B better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (32.3 vs 32.4); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and Yi-1.5-34B share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and Yi-1.5-34B has 21.