Model comparison
Codestral vs Gemma 2 2b IT
Gemma 2 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.1 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Gemma 2 2b IT leads 32.3 to 27.3.
- Gemma 2 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Codestral | Gemma 2 2b IT | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Noometry Index | 30.6 | 33.1 |
| Released | 2024-05-29 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 8K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.90 | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 2 2b IT leads
Codestral: 27.3 (#321), Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#273)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 11.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 41.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1112 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.5% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 137.78 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 73.8% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.9% | — |
Reasoning Gemma 2 2b IT leads
Codestral: 19.8 (#251), Gemma 2 2b IT: 21.4 (#224)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 32.5% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1113 |
Math Not comparable
Codestral: —, Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.6 (#212)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1135 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codestral: —, Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.9 (#231)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1096 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Codestral: —, Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#257)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1121 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1132 |
| LMArena French | — | 1157 |
| LMArena German | — | 1114 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1055 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1118 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1140 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Codestral: —, Gemma 2 2b IT: 57.8 (#263)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1118 |
Long Context Not comparable
Codestral: —, Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.3 (#250)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1130 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Codestral: —, Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.5 (#263)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1156 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1147 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1118 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codestral better than Gemma 2 2b IT?
Gemma 2 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.1 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Codestral or Gemma 2 2b IT better for coding?
Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.3 versus 27.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Codestral and Gemma 2 2b IT share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codestral has 7 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 2 2b IT has 17.