Model comparison
Gemma 2 2b IT vs Qwen1.5-14B
Gemma 2 2b IT and Qwen1.5-14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.5 vs 32.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen1.5-14B in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
Side by side
| Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen1.5-14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 32.5 | 32.1 |
| Released | — | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Gemma 2 2b IT: 31.8 (#268), Qwen1.5-14B: 32.5 (#259)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | 1138 |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemma 2 2b IT: 20.5 (#219), Qwen1.5-14B: 20.5 (#217)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1113 |
Math Too close to call
Gemma 2 2b IT: 30.1 (#212), Qwen1.5-14B: 29.9 (#214)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1135 | 1125 |
Knowledge Too close to call
Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.3 (#229), Qwen1.5-14B: 29.3 (#230)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | 1094 |
| MMLU | — | 68.6% |
Multilingual Gemma 2 2b IT leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.5 (#252), Qwen1.5-14B: 30.8 (#257)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | 1095 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1147 |
| LMArena French | 1156 | 1115 |
| LMArena German | 1114 | 1043 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | 1019 |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | 1046 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | 1085 |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | — |
Instruction Following Gemma 2 2b IT leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 58.1 (#258), Qwen1.5-14B: 57.1 (#266)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | 1102 |
Long Context Too close to call
Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.2 (#245), Qwen1.5-14B: 33.7 (#252)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | 1113 |
Writing & Preference Gemma 2 2b IT leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.6 (#258), Qwen1.5-14B: 33.7 (#270)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | 1128 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | 1110 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than Qwen1.5-14B?
Gemma 2 2b IT and Qwen1.5-14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.5 vs 32.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Gemma 2 2b IT or Qwen1.5-14B better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (31.8 vs 32.5); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and Qwen1.5-14B share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-14B has 17.