Model comparison

Command R+ vs Gemma 2 2b IT

Command R+ and Gemma 2 2b IT score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.4 vs 33.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Command R+ Cohere

32.4

Rank #257 Confirmed

Gemma 2 2b IT Google

33.1

Rank #248 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 5 categories and Gemma 2 2b IT in 3 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemma 2 2b IT leads 21.4 to 9.2.

Side by side

Command R+ and Gemma 2 2b IT specifications
Command R+Gemma 2 2b IT
ProviderCohereGoogle
Noometry Index32.433.1
Released2024-08-30—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K—
Max output4K—
Input $ / M tokens$2.50—
Output $ / M tokens$10—
Results tracked3417

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemma 2 2b IT leads

Command R+: 29.1 (#309), Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#273)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Gemma 2 2b IT
LMArena Coding11871112
BigCodeBench Instruct33.8%—
LiveBench Coding19.1%—
BigCodeBench Complete41.9%—
HumanEval+56.7%—
MBPP+63.5%—

Reasoning Gemma 2 2b IT leads

Command R+: 9.2 (#344), Gemma 2 2b IT: 21.4 (#224)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Gemma 2 2b IT
LMArena Hard Prompts11861113
SimpleBench17.4%—
LiveBench Reasoning24.8%—
DTBench54.9%—
LiveBench Data Analysis38.1%—
LMCA5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index119.34—
LiveBench31.8%—

Math Gemma 2 2b IT leads

Command R+: 28.9 (#242), Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.6 (#212)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Gemma 2 2b IT
LMArena Math11881135
LiveBench Math21.3%—

Knowledge Command R+ leads

Command R+: 36.4 (#169), Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.9 (#231)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Gemma 2 2b IT
LMArena Expert11741096
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.9%—
MMLU69.4%—

Multilingual Command R+ leads

Command R+: 38.6 (#227), Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#257)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Gemma 2 2b IT
LMArena Non-English12161121
LMArena Chinese12261132
LMArena French12091157
LMArena German12161114
LMArena Japanese11661083
LMArena Korean11381055
LMArena Russian12271118
LMArena Spanish11891140

Instruction Following Command R+ leads

Command R+: 60.0 (#254), Gemma 2 2b IT: 57.8 (#263)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Gemma 2 2b IT
LMArena Instruction Following11971118
LiveBench Instruction Following57.6%—

Long Context Command R+ leads

Command R+: 37.3 (#219), Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.3 (#250)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Gemma 2 2b IT
LMArena Longer Query12301130

Writing & Preference Command R+ leads

Command R+: 43.5 (#228), Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.5 (#263)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Gemma 2 2b IT
LMArena Text12291156
LMArena Creative Writing12351147
LMArena Multi-Turn12131118
LiveBench Language29.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command R+ better than Gemma 2 2b IT?

Command R+ and Gemma 2 2b IT score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.4 vs 33.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Command R+ or Gemma 2 2b IT better for coding?

Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.3 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Gemma 2 2b IT share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 2 2b IT has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper