Model comparison
Gemma 2 2b IT vs o3-pro
o3-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in long context, where o3-pro leads 72.2 to 34.3.
- Gemma 2 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 2 2b IT | o3-pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Noometry Index | 33.1 | 42.9 |
| Released | — | 2025-06-10 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 200K |
| Max output | — | 100K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $20 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $80 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding o3-pro leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#273), o3-pro: 55.5 (#24)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 84.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 58.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | — |
Reasoning o3-pro leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 21.4 (#224), o3-pro: 23.8 (#171)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 4.9% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 72.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 59.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | — |
| DTBench | — | 86.9% |
| LMCA | — | 38.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 147.42 |
Math Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.6 (#212), o3-pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1135 | — |
Knowledge Too close to call
Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.9 (#231), o3-pro: 29.5 (#238)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Confabulations | — | 14.2% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 23.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#257), o3-pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | — |
| LMArena French | 1157 | — |
| LMArena German | 1114 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 57.8 (#263), o3-pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | — |
Long Context o3-pro leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.3 (#250), o3-pro: 72.2 (#1)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 97.2% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | — |
Writing & Preference o3-pro leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.5 (#263), o3-pro: 57.1 (#133)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 84.4% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than o3-pro?
o3-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 2 2b IT or o3-pro better for coding?
o3-pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and o3-pro share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and o3-pro has 12.