Model comparison

Gemma 2 2b IT vs Muse Spark 1.1

Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 2 2b IT Google

32.5

Rank #244 Confirmed

Muse Spark 1.1 Meta

49.9

Rank #43 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.1 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Spark 1.1 leads 73.6 to 36.6.
  • Gemma 2 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemma 2 2b IT and Muse Spark 1.1 specifications
Gemma 2 2b ITMuse Spark 1.1
ProviderGoogleMeta
Noometry Index32.549.9
Released—2026-04-08
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.25
Output $ / M tokens—$4.25
Results tracked1736

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Gemma 2 2b IT: 31.8 (#268), Muse Spark 1.1: 50.8 (#38)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 2b ITMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Coding11121497
DeepSWE—53.3%
LMArena WebDev—1542
SciCode—58.8%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 2 2b IT: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 33.9 (#45)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 2b ITMuse Spark 1.1
τ²-bench Banking—40.5%
GBAEval—7.9%
GDP.pdf—15%
Vending-Bench 2—6,520

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Gemma 2 2b IT: 20.5 (#219), Muse Spark 1.1: 45.9 (#41)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 2b ITMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Hard Prompts11131486
NYT Connections (extended)—84.9%
CritPt—15.1%
DTBench—94.4%
LMCA—49.9%
Surface Evolver Bench—52.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—154.32

Math Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Gemma 2 2b IT: 30.1 (#212), Muse Spark 1.1: 44.0 (#67)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 2b ITMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Math11351477
ProofBench—39%

Knowledge Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.3 (#229), Muse Spark 1.1: 52.8 (#55)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 2b ITMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Expert10961480
SimpleQA Verified—57.8%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 2 2b IT: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 41.9 (#28)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 2b ITMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision—1292
LMArena Document—1465

Multilingual Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.5 (#252), Muse Spark 1.1: 56.8 (#16)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 2b ITMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Non-English11211471
LMArena Chinese11321518
LMArena French11561494
LMArena German11141466
LMArena Japanese10831445
LMArena Korean10551459
LMArena Russian11181482
LMArena Spanish11401471

Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Gemma 2 2b IT: 58.1 (#258), Muse Spark 1.1: 76.8 (#36)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 2b ITMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Instruction Following11181457

Long Context Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.2 (#245), Muse Spark 1.1: 44.8 (#55)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 2b ITMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Longer Query11301463

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.6 (#258), Muse Spark 1.1: 73.6 (#11)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 2b ITMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text11561479
LMArena Creative Writing11471440
LMArena Multi-Turn11181484
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1927
EQ-Bench 4—1260

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than Muse Spark 1.1?

Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 2 2b IT or Muse Spark 1.1 better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.8 versus 31.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and Muse Spark 1.1 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.1 has 36.

Related comparisons

Go deeper