Model comparison
Gemma 2 2b IT vs Mistral Nemo
Gemma 2 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.1 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Mistral AISummary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemma 2 2b IT leads 29.9 to 12.3.
Side by side
| Gemma 2 2b IT | Mistral Nemo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Noometry Index | 33.1 | 26.4 |
| Released | — | 2024-07-01 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.15 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.15 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#273), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: —, Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#125)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 27.6% |
| BALROG | — | 17.6% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemma 2 2b IT: 21.4 (#224), Mistral Nemo: 20.7 (#232)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | — |
| DTBench | — | 48.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 118.68 |
| PIQA | — | 83.5% |
Math Gemma 2 2b IT leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.6 (#212), Mistral Nemo: 25.5 (#268)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1135 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 10.8% |
| GSM8K | — | 84.2% |
Knowledge Gemma 2 2b IT leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.9 (#231), Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#298)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 29.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | — |
| BoolQ | — | 82.5% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#257), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | — |
| LMArena French | 1157 | — |
| LMArena German | 1114 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 57.8 (#263), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.3 (#250), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | — |
Writing & Preference Gemma 2 2b IT leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.5 (#263), Mistral Nemo: 28.5 (#296)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 881 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than Mistral Nemo?
Gemma 2 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.1 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and Mistral Nemo share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Nemo has 10.