Model comparison
Gemma 2 2b IT vs Qwen Turbo
Gemma 2 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.1 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 2 2b IT leads 32.6 to 15.3.
- Gemma 2 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 33.1 | 27.1 |
| Released | — | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.05 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.20 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#273), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 21.4 (#224), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | — |
Math Gemma 2 2b IT leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.6 (#212), Qwen Turbo: 15.3 (#297)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 6.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1135 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.2% |
Knowledge Gemma 2 2b IT leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.9 (#231), Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#272)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#257), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | — |
| LMArena French | 1157 | — |
| LMArena German | 1114 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 57.8 (#263), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.3 (#250), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.5 (#263), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than Qwen Turbo?
Gemma 2 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.1 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and Qwen Turbo share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Turbo has 3.