Model comparison
Gemma 2 2b IT vs Qwen3-4B
Gemma 2 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.1 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3-4B leads 33.0 to 29.9.
Side by side
| Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen3-4B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 33.1 | 31.9 |
| Released | — | 2025-04-29 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#273), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: —, Qwen3-4B: 27.6 (#100)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 35.7% |
Reasoning Gemma 2 2b IT leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 21.4 (#224), Qwen3-4B: 19.2 (#268)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | — |
Math Gemma 2 2b IT leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.6 (#212), Qwen3-4B: 29.7 (#240)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 38.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 52.2% |
| LMArena Math | 1135 | — |
Knowledge Qwen3-4B leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.9 (#231), Qwen3-4B: 33.0 (#208)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 52.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#257), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | — |
| LMArena French | 1157 | — |
| LMArena German | 1114 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 57.8 (#263), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.3 (#250), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.5 (#263), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than Qwen3-4B?
Gemma 2 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.1 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and Qwen3-4B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-4B has 6.