Model comparison
Gemma 2 2b IT vs Llama 3.2 90B
Gemma 2 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.1 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
MetaSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 2 2b IT leads 32.6 to 11.1.
Side by side
| Gemma 2 2b IT | Llama 3.2 90B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | |
| Noometry Index | 33.1 | 27.5 |
| Released | — | 2024-09-24 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#273), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: —, Llama 3.2 90B: 30.0 (#80)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 27.3% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemma 2 2b IT: 21.4 (#224), Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#217)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 125.5 |
Math Gemma 2 2b IT leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.6 (#212), Llama 3.2 90B: 11.1 (#308)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1135 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 39.4% |
Knowledge Gemma 2 2b IT leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.9 (#231), Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#274)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41% |
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | — |
| MMLU | — | 80.3% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: —, Llama 3.2 90B: 25.4 (#124)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1000 |
| GeoBench | — | 52% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#257), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | — |
| LMArena French | 1157 | — |
| LMArena German | 1114 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 57.8 (#263), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.3 (#250), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.5 (#263), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than Llama 3.2 90B?
Gemma 2 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.1 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and Llama 3.2 90B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 90B has 9.