Model comparison
Gemma 2 2b IT vs Grok Build 0.1
Grok Build 0.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.4 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok Build 0.1 leads 32.2 to 21.4.
- Gemma 2 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok Build 0.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | |
| Noometry Index | 33.1 | 36.4 |
| Released | — | 2026-04-16 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 256K |
| Max output | — | 256K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok Build 0.1 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#273), Grok Build 0.1: 43.1 (#91)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 50.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: —, Grok Build 0.1: 22.7 (#129)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| GBAEval | — | 2.4% |
Reasoning Grok Build 0.1 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 21.4 (#224), Grok Build 0.1: 32.2 (#77)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 9.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | — |
Math Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.6 (#212), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1135 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.9 (#231), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#257), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | — |
| LMArena French | 1157 | — |
| LMArena German | 1114 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 57.8 (#263), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.3 (#250), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.5 (#263), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than Grok Build 0.1?
Grok Build 0.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.4 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 2 2b IT or Grok Build 0.1 better for coding?
Grok Build 0.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.1 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and Grok Build 0.1 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and Grok Build 0.1 has 3.