Model comparison

Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) vs Grok Build 0.1

Grok Build 0.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.8 to 32.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) Google

32.9

Rank #240 Confirmed

Grok Build 0.1 xAI

35.8

Rank #214 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok Build 0.1 leads 31.3 to 20.8.

Side by side

Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) and Grok Build 0.1 specifications
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024)Grok Build 0.1
ProviderGooglexAI
Noometry Index32.935.8
Released2024-05-142026-04-16
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—256K
Max output—256K
Input $ / M tokens—$1
Output $ / M tokens—$2
Results tracked423

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok Build 0.1 leads

Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 33.9 (#233), Grok Build 0.1: 42.5 (#90)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024)Grok Build 0.1
SciCode—50.2%
WeirdML24.9%—
BigCodeBench Instruct43.5%—
LMArena Coding1262—
BigCodeBench Complete55.1%—
HumanEval+75.6%—
MBPP+67.5%—

Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) leads

Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 26.3 (#97), Grok Build 0.1: 22.5 (#122)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024)Grok Build 0.1
BALROG14.6%—
GBAEval—2.4%

Reasoning Grok Build 0.1 leads

Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 20.8 (#212), Grok Build 0.1: 31.3 (#73)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024)Grok Build 0.1
CritPt—9.1%
LMArena Hard Prompts1257—
DTBench53.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index129.37—
ForecastBench53.9—
PIQA87.5%—

Math Not comparable

Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 20.8 (#274), Grok Build 0.1: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024)Grok Build 0.1
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202516.3%—
Omni-MATH30.4%—
LMArena Math1269—
MATH Level 561.9%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0%—
GSM8K82.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 26.2 (#253), Grok Build 0.1: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024)Grok Build 0.1
GPQA Diamond47.3%—
MMLU-Pro67.8%—
GPQA (HELM)43.7%—
LMArena Expert1233—
BoolQ85.8%—
MMLU77.9%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 35.3 (#76), Grok Build 0.1: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024)Grok Build 0.1
LMArena Vision1141—
Video-MME70.3%—
GeoBench76%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 43.1 (#184), Grok Build 0.1: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024)Grok Build 0.1
LMArena Non-English1278—
LMArena Chinese1295—
LMArena French1257—
LMArena German1262—
LMArena Japanese1252—
LMArena Korean1220—
LMArena Russian1288—
LMArena Spanish1242—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 67.0 (#199), Grok Build 0.1: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024)Grok Build 0.1
IFEval83.1%—
LMArena Instruction Following1258—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 39.0 (#182), Grok Build 0.1: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024)Grok Build 0.1
LMArena Longer Query1284—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 48.9 (#190), Grok Build 0.1: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024)Grok Build 0.1
LMArena Text1287—
LMArena Creative Writing1285—
WildBench79.2%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1253—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) better than Grok Build 0.1?

Grok Build 0.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.8 to 32.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) or Grok Build 0.1 better for coding?

Grok Build 0.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.5 versus 33.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) and Grok Build 0.1 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) has 42 scored results on Noometry and Grok Build 0.1 has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper