Model comparison
Gemma 2 2b IT vs GLM-4.5V
GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-4.5V in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.5V leads 52.5 to 36.5.
Side by side
| Gemma 2 2b IT | GLM-4.5V | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | |
| Noometry Index | 33.1 | 39.8 |
| Released | — | 2025-08-11 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 64K |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.60 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.80 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.5V leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#273), GLM-4.5V: 39.5 (#155)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | 1347 |
Reasoning GLM-4.5V leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 21.4 (#224), GLM-4.5V: 27.4 (#119)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1334 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 59.8% |
Math GLM-4.5V leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.6 (#212), GLM-4.5V: 37.4 (#159)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1135 | 1354 |
Knowledge GLM-4.5V leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.9 (#231), GLM-4.5V: 37.5 (#156)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | 1353 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: —, GLM-4.5V: 34.3 (#92)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1154 |
Multilingual GLM-4.5V leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#257), GLM-4.5V: 44.6 (#177)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | 1303 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1337 |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | 1298 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | 1336 |
| LMArena French | 1157 | — |
| LMArena German | 1114 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | — |
Instruction Following GLM-4.5V leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 57.8 (#263), GLM-4.5V: 69.2 (#175)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | 1311 |
Long Context GLM-4.5V leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.3 (#250), GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#171)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | 1304 |
Writing & Preference GLM-4.5V leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.5 (#263), GLM-4.5V: 52.5 (#170)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | 1333 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | 1295 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | 1332 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than GLM-4.5V?
GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 2 2b IT or GLM-4.5V better for coding?
GLM-4.5V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and GLM-4.5V share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.5V has 15.