Model comparison
Gemma 2 2b IT vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 48.9 to 29.9.
- Gemma 2 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 33.1 | 39.9 |
| Released | — | 2026-07-15 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.03 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.13 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#273), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | — |
Reasoning Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 21.4 (#224), Qwen3.7 Flash: 28.2 (#108)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 43.8% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 23% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 15% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 144.64 |
Math Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.6 (#212), Qwen3.7 Flash: 38.3 (#140)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 19.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1135 | — |
Knowledge Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.9 (#231), Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#75)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 82.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#257), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | — |
| LMArena French | 1157 | — |
| LMArena German | 1114 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 57.8 (#263), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.3 (#250), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.5 (#263), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and Qwen3.7 Flash share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.