Model comparison
Gemma 2 27B vs Yi-1.5-34B
Yi-1.5-34B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.6 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 21 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 27B scores higher in 6 categories and Yi-1.5-34B in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Yi-1.5-34B leads 27.5 to 10.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Instruct: 42.8% for Gemma 2 27B and 33.9% for Yi-1.5-34B.
Side by side
| Gemma 2 27B | Yi-1.5-34B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | 01.AI | |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 30.6 |
| Released | 2024-06-24 | 2024-05-13 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 8K | — |
| Max output | 2K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.65 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.65 | — |
| Results tracked | 34 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 2 27B leads
Gemma 2 27B: 34.1 (#246), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.4 (#272)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 42.8% | 33.9% |
| LMArena Coding | 1211 | 1169 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.5% | 43.8% |
| LiveBench Coding | 36% | — |
Reasoning Yi-1.5-34B leads
Gemma 2 27B: 15.3 (#315), Yi-1.5-34B: 22.5 (#191)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1198 | 1160 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 28.1% | — |
| DTBench | 48% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 47.9% | — |
| LMCA | 7.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 122.08 | — |
| LiveBench | 38.2% | — |
Math Yi-1.5-34B leads
Gemma 2 27B: 10.7 (#311), Yi-1.5-34B: 27.5 (#249)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1212 | 1182 |
| MATH Level 5 | 27.9% | 25.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 26.5% | — |
Knowledge Gemma 2 27B leads
Gemma 2 27B: 19.0 (#280), Yi-1.5-34B: 14.8 (#295)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 36.5% | 32% |
| LMArena Expert | 1172 | 1144 |
| Confabulations | 27.1% | — |
| MMLU | 75.7% | — |
Multilingual Gemma 2 27B leads
Gemma 2 27B: 38.6 (#226), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.3 (#256)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1217 | 1121 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1221 | 1213 |
| LMArena French | 1247 | 1156 |
| LMArena German | 1209 | 1111 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1175 | 1021 |
| LMArena Korean | 1174 | 1005 |
| LMArena Russian | 1234 | 1091 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1228 | 1121 |
Instruction Following Gemma 2 27B leads
Gemma 2 27B: 60.5 (#249), Yi-1.5-34B: 59.2 (#257)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1206 | 1139 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 58.1% | — |
Long Context Gemma 2 27B leads
Gemma 2 27B: 37.3 (#218), Yi-1.5-34B: 34.6 (#248)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1231 | 1143 |
Writing & Preference Gemma 2 27B leads
Gemma 2 27B: 44.2 (#225), Yi-1.5-34B: 37.4 (#257)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1231 | 1173 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1241 | 1135 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1224 | 1153 |
| LiveBench Language | 32.6% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2 27B better than Yi-1.5-34B?
Yi-1.5-34B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.6 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 2 27B or Yi-1.5-34B better for coding?
Gemma 2 27B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.1 versus 32.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 27B and Yi-1.5-34B share?
21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 27B has 34 scored results on Noometry and Yi-1.5-34B has 21.