Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Yi-1.5-34B
Yi-1.5-34B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.6 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 2 categories and Yi-1.5-34B in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Yi-1.5-34B leads 37.4 to 25.1.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Yi-1.5-34B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | 01.AI | |
| Noometry Index | 29.3 | 30.6 |
| Released | — | 2024-05-13 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Yi-1.5-34B leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.4 (#272)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | 1169 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 33.9% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 43.8% |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |
Reasoning Yi-1.5-34B leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270), Yi-1.5-34B: 22.5 (#191)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1160 |
Math Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232), Yi-1.5-34B: 27.5 (#249)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | 1182 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 25.5% |
Knowledge Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258), Yi-1.5-34B: 14.8 (#295)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | 1144 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 32% |
Multilingual Yi-1.5-34B leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.3 (#256)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | 1121 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1012 | 1213 |
| LMArena German | 944 | 1111 |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | 1005 |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | 1091 |
| LMArena French | — | 1156 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1021 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1121 |
Instruction Following Yi-1.5-34B leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299), Yi-1.5-34B: 59.2 (#257)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | 1139 |
Long Context Yi-1.5-34B leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286), Yi-1.5-34B: 34.6 (#248)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | 1143 |
Writing & Preference Yi-1.5-34B leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306), Yi-1.5-34B: 37.4 (#257)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | 1173 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | 1135 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 959 | 1153 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Yi-1.5-34B?
Yi-1.5-34B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.6 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or Yi-1.5-34B better for coding?
Yi-1.5-34B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.4 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Yi-1.5-34B share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Yi-1.5-34B has 21.