Model comparison

Gemma 2 27B vs Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct

Gemma 2 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.2 to 27.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 25 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 2 27B Google

29.2

Rank #302 Confirmed

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct Microsoft

27.4

Rank #324 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 25 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 27B scores higher in 6 categories and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 2 27B leads 44.4 to 27.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is LiveBench Language: 32.6% for Gemma 2 27B and 9.2% for Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct.

Side by side

Gemma 2 27B and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct specifications
Gemma 2 27BPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
ProviderGoogleMicrosoft
Noometry Index29.227.4
Released2024-06-242024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window8K—
Max output2K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.65—
Output $ / M tokens$0.65—
Results tracked3435

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemma 2 27B leads

Gemma 2 27B: 33.5 (#243), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.1 (#319)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LiveBench Coding36%15.5%
LMArena Coding12111093
BigCodeBench Instruct42.8%—
BigCodeBench Complete52.5%—
HumanEval+—59.1%
MBPP+—54.2%

Reasoning Gemma 2 27B leads

Gemma 2 27B: 14.8 (#313), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 13.6 (#326)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LiveBench Reasoning28.1%26.8%
LMArena Hard Prompts11991072
LiveBench Data Analysis47.9%34.7%
LiveBench38.2%22.4%
Chess Puzzles—0%
DTBench48%—
LMCA7.1%—
Adversarial NLI—52.8%
BIG-Bench Hard—71.7%
Epoch Capabilities Index122.06—
HellaSwag—76.7%
WinoGrande—70.8%

Math Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct leads

Gemma 2 27B: 10.0 (#306), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 24.5 (#258)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LiveBench Math26.5%15.7%
LMArena Math12121111
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.4%—
MATH Level 527.9%—

Knowledge Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct leads

Gemma 2 27B: 18.9 (#275), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 27.9 (#241)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Expert11721045
MMLU75.7%68.8%
GPQA Diamond36.5%—
Confabulations27.1%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—84.9%
OpenBookQA—88%
TriviaQA—64%

Multilingual Gemma 2 27B leads

Gemma 2 27B: 38.8 (#221), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.5 (#275)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Non-English12171021
LMArena Chinese12211021
LMArena French12461075
LMArena German12091044
LMArena Japanese1175935
LMArena Korean1174905
LMArena Russian12341022
LMArena Spanish12281084

Instruction Following Gemma 2 27B leads

Gemma 2 27B: 60.7 (#244), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 48.0 (#298)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LiveBench Instruction Following58.1%39.1%
LMArena Instruction Following12061053

Long Context Gemma 2 27B leads

Gemma 2 27B: 37.3 (#213), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 31.7 (#271)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query12311044

Writing & Preference Gemma 2 27B leads

Gemma 2 27B: 44.4 (#220), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 27.7 (#295)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Text12311073
LMArena Creative Writing12411037
LMArena Multi-Turn12241018
LiveBench Language32.6%9.2%

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 2 27B better than Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct?

Gemma 2 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.2 to 27.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 2 27B or Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct better for coding?

Gemma 2 27B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.5 versus 26.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 27B and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct share?

25 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 27B has 34 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct has 35.

Related comparisons

Go deeper