Model comparison

OLMo 2 Furious 13B vs Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct

OLMo 2 Furious 13B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.7 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. OLMo 2 Furious 13B scores higher in 4 categories and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct in 2 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads 42.9 to 27.6.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is LiveBench Instruction Following: 60.6% for OLMo 2 Furious 13B and 39.1% for Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct.

Side by side

OLMo 2 Furious 13B and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct specifications
OLMo 2 Furious 13BPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
ProviderAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)Microsoft
Noometry Index29.727.9
Released2024-12-312024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1235

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#323)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LiveBench Coding10.4%15.5%
LMArena Coding—1093
HumanEval+—59.1%
MBPP+—54.2%

Reasoning OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 14.1 (#328)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LiveBench Reasoning16.3%26.8%
LiveBench Data Analysis20.6%34.7%
LiveBench22.1%22.4%
Chess Puzzles—0%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1072
Adversarial NLI—52.8%
BIG-Bench Hard—71.7%
HellaSwag—76.7%
WinoGrande—70.8%

Math Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct leads

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#257)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LiveBench Math13.6%15.7%
Omni-MATH15.6%—
LMArena Math—1111

Knowledge Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct leads

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 28.5 (#246)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
MMLU-Pro31%—
GPQA (HELM)31.6%—
LMArena Expert—1045
ARC (AI2) Challenge—84.9%
MMLU—68.8%
OpenBookQA—88%
TriviaQA—64%

Multilingual Not comparable

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —, Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.3 (#280)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Non-English—1021
LMArena Chinese—1021
LMArena French—1076
LMArena German—1044
LMArena Japanese—935
LMArena Korean—905
LMArena Russian—1022
LMArena Spanish—1085

Instruction Following OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 47.7 (#303)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LiveBench Instruction Following60.6%39.1%
IFEval73%—
LMArena Instruction Following—1053

Long Context Not comparable

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —, Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 31.7 (#276)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query—1044

Writing & Preference OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 27.6 (#300)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LiveBench Language11.2%9.2%
LMArena Text—1073
LMArena Creative Writing—1037
WildBench68.9%—
LMArena Multi-Turn—1018

Frequently asked questions

Is OLMo 2 Furious 13B better than Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct?

OLMo 2 Furious 13B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.7 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is OLMo 2 Furious 13B or Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct better for coding?

OLMo 2 Furious 13B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 28.6 versus 26.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do OLMo 2 Furious 13B and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct has 35.

Related comparisons

Go deeper