Model comparison
Gemma 2 27B vs Olmo 7b Instruct
Gemma 2 27B and Olmo 7b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.4 vs 30.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Google
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 27B scores higher in 4 categories and Olmo 7b Instruct in 2 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Olmo 7b Instruct leads 30.2 to 10.7.
Side by side
| Gemma 2 27B | Olmo 7b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 30.3 |
| Released | 2024-06-24 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 8K | — |
| Max output | 2K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.65 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.65 | — |
| Results tracked | 34 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 2 27B leads
Gemma 2 27B: 34.1 (#246), Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1211 | 1016 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 42.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 36% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.5% | — |
Reasoning Olmo 7b Instruct leads
Gemma 2 27B: 15.3 (#315), Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1198 | 993 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 28.1% | — |
| DTBench | 48% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 47.9% | — |
| LMCA | 7.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 122.08 | — |
| LiveBench | 38.2% | — |
Math Olmo 7b Instruct leads
Gemma 2 27B: 10.7 (#311), Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1212 | 1018 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 26.5% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 27.9% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 2 27B: 19.0 (#280), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 36.5% | — |
| Confabulations | 27.1% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1172 | — |
| MMLU | 75.7% | — |
Multilingual Gemma 2 27B leads
Gemma 2 27B: 38.6 (#226), Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1217 | 977 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1221 | 1014 |
| LMArena Russian | 1234 | 947 |
| LMArena French | 1247 | — |
| LMArena German | 1209 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1175 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1228 | — |
Instruction Following Gemma 2 27B leads
Gemma 2 27B: 60.5 (#249), Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1206 | 978 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 58.1% | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 2 27B: 37.3 (#218), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1231 | — |
Writing & Preference Gemma 2 27B leads
Gemma 2 27B: 44.2 (#225), Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1231 | 1032 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1241 | 990 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1224 | 1007 |
| LiveBench Language | 32.6% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2 27B better than Olmo 7b Instruct?
Gemma 2 27B and Olmo 7b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.4 vs 30.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Gemma 2 27B or Olmo 7b Instruct better for coding?
Gemma 2 27B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.1 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 27B and Olmo 7b Instruct share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 27B has 34 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 7b Instruct has 10.