Model comparison

Gemma 2 27B vs Hy4 preview

Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 2 27B costs 1.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Hy4 preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 2 27B Google

29.4

Rank #312 Confirmed

Hy4 preview Tencent

45.3

Rank #73 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Hy4 preview leads 55.7 to 10.7.
  • Gemma 2 27B is cheaper at $0.65 / $0.65 per million input/output tokens, against $0.75 / $2.25 for Hy4 preview.
  • Hy4 preview accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 8K.

Side by side

Gemma 2 27B and Hy4 preview specifications
Gemma 2 27BHy4 preview
ProviderGoogleTencent
Noometry Index29.445.3
Released2024-06-242026-08-28
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window8K1.05M
Max output2K64K
Input $ / M tokens$0.65$0.75
Output $ / M tokens$0.65$2.25
Results tracked343

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hy4 preview leads

Gemma 2 27B: 34.1 (#246), Hy4 preview: 51.6 (#38)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BHy4 preview
LMArena WebDev—1632
BigCodeBench Instruct42.8%—
LiveBench Coding36%—
LMArena Coding1211—
BigCodeBench Complete52.5%—

Reasoning Hy4 preview leads

Gemma 2 27B: 15.3 (#315), Hy4 preview: 31.9 (#79)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BHy4 preview
NYT Connections (extended)—68.2%
LiveBench Reasoning28.1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1198—
DTBench48%—
LiveBench Data Analysis47.9%—
LMCA7.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index122.08—
LiveBench38.2%—

Math Hy4 preview leads

Gemma 2 27B: 10.7 (#311), Hy4 preview: 55.7 (#42)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BHy4 preview
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.4%—
ProofBench—75%
LiveBench Math26.5%—
LMArena Math1212—
MATH Level 527.9%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemma 2 27B: 19.0 (#280), Hy4 preview: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BHy4 preview
GPQA Diamond36.5%—
Confabulations27.1%—
LMArena Expert1172—
MMLU75.7%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemma 2 27B: 38.6 (#226), Hy4 preview: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BHy4 preview
LMArena Non-English1217—
LMArena Chinese1221—
LMArena French1247—
LMArena German1209—
LMArena Japanese1175—
LMArena Korean1174—
LMArena Russian1234—
LMArena Spanish1228—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemma 2 27B: 60.5 (#249), Hy4 preview: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BHy4 preview
LiveBench Instruction Following58.1%—
LMArena Instruction Following1206—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemma 2 27B: 37.3 (#218), Hy4 preview: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BHy4 preview
LMArena Longer Query1231—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemma 2 27B: 44.2 (#225), Hy4 preview: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BHy4 preview
LMArena Text1231—
LMArena Creative Writing1241—
LMArena Multi-Turn1224—
LiveBench Language32.6%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 2 27B better than Hy4 preview?

Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 2 27B costs 1.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Hy4 preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 2 27B or Hy4 preview?

Gemma 2 27B is cheaper. It lists at $0.65 per million input tokens and $0.65 per million output tokens; Hy4 preview lists at $0.75 and $2.25.

Is Gemma 2 27B or Hy4 preview better for coding?

Hy4 preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.6 versus 34.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Hy4 preview does, with 1.05M tokens against 8K.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 27B and Hy4 preview share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 27B has 34 scored results on Noometry and Hy4 preview has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper