Model comparison
Gemma 2 27B vs GPT-5.2 Pro
GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 2 27B costs 89× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.2 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemma 2 27B scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-5.2 Pro in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.2 Pro leads 65.3 to 10.7.
- Gemma 2 27B is cheaper at $0.65 / $0.65 per million input/output tokens, against $21 / $168 for GPT-5.2 Pro.
- GPT-5.2 Pro accepts more context: 400K tokens versus 8K.
- Gemma 2 27B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 2 27B | GPT-5.2 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 52.3 |
| Released | 2024-06-24 | 2025-12-11 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 8K | 400K |
| Max output | 2K | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.65 | $21 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.65 | $168 |
| Results tracked | 34 | 8 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 2 27B: 34.1 (#246), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 42.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 36% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1211 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.5% | — |
Reasoning GPT-5.2 Pro leads
Gemma 2 27B: 15.3 (#315), GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.5 (#33)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 122.08 | 155.4 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 54.2% |
| SimpleBench | — | 57.4% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 79.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 90.5% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 28.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1198 | — |
| DTBench | 48% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 47.9% | — |
| LMCA | 7.1% | — |
| LiveBench | 38.2% | — |
Math GPT-5.2 Pro leads
Gemma 2 27B: 10.7 (#311), GPT-5.2 Pro: 65.3 (#29)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 74% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 46% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 26.5% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1212 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 27.9% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 31.3% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 2 27B: 19.0 (#280), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 36.5% | — |
| Confabulations | 27.1% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1172 | — |
| MMLU | 75.7% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 2 27B: 38.6 (#226), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1217 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1221 | — |
| LMArena French | 1247 | — |
| LMArena German | 1209 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1175 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1234 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1228 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 2 27B: 60.5 (#249), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 58.1% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1206 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 2 27B: 37.3 (#218), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1231 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 2 27B: 44.2 (#225), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1231 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1241 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1224 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 32.6% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2 27B better than GPT-5.2 Pro?
GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 2 27B costs 89× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.2 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Gemma 2 27B or GPT-5.2 Pro?
Gemma 2 27B is cheaper. It lists at $0.65 per million input tokens and $0.65 per million output tokens; GPT-5.2 Pro lists at $21 and $168.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-5.2 Pro does, with 400K tokens against 8K.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 27B and GPT-5.2 Pro share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemma 2 27B has 34 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.2 Pro has 8.