Model comparison

Gemma 1.1 7b IT vs Olmo 7b Instruct

Gemma 1.1 7b IT and Olmo 7b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.3 vs 30.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 1.1 7b IT Google

31.3

Rank #277 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 7b IT scores higher in 6 categories and Olmo 7b Instruct in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in instruction following, where Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads 54.0 to 49.0.

Side by side

Gemma 1.1 7b IT and Olmo 7b Instruct specifications
Gemma 1.1 7b ITOlmo 7b Instruct
ProviderGoogleAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index31.330.3
Released——
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1910

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 31.5 (#284), Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Coding10841016
HumanEval+35.4%—
MBPP+45%—

Reasoning Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 20.5 (#238), Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts1071993

Math Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.0 (#220), Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Math11071018

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.3 (#247), Olmo 7b Instruct: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Expert1039—

Multilingual Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.1 (#273), Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Non-English1052977
LMArena Chinese10611014
LMArena Russian1046947
LMArena French1065—
LMArena German1054—
LMArena Japanese971—
LMArena Korean988—
LMArena Spanish1049—

Instruction Following Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 54.0 (#283), Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following1057978

Long Context Not comparable

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.1 (#272), Olmo 7b Instruct: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1056—

Writing & Preference Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 30.4 (#288), Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Text10941032
LMArena Creative Writing1060990
LMArena Multi-Turn10401007

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT better than Olmo 7b Instruct?

Gemma 1.1 7b IT and Olmo 7b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.3 vs 30.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT or Olmo 7b Instruct better for coding?

Gemma 1.1 7b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.5 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 7b IT and Olmo 7b Instruct share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 7b IT has 19 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 7b Instruct has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper