Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 7b IT vs Mercury 2.5
Gemma 1.1 7b IT has enough public results to be ranked (#275); Mercury 2.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads 29.5 to 22.4.
- Gemma 1.1 7b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Mercury 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Inception | |
| Noometry Index | 30.7 | 30.2 |
| Released | — | 2026-09-08 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 260K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.04 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.15 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 2 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 31.0 (#279), Mercury 2.5: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1084 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 301.65 |
| HumanEval+ | 35.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 45% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 19.6 (#235), Mercury 2.5: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1071 | — |
Math Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 29.5 (#217), Mercury 2.5: 22.4
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 3% |
| LMArena Math | 1107 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 27.8 (#242), Mercury 2.5: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1039 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.3 (#268), Mercury 2.5: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1052 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1060 | — |
| LMArena French | 1064 | — |
| LMArena German | 1054 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 971 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 988 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1046 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1049 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 54.3 (#278), Mercury 2.5: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1057 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.0 (#267), Mercury 2.5: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1056 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 30.6 (#283), Mercury 2.5: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1094 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1059 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1040 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT better than Mercury 2.5?
Gemma 1.1 7b IT has enough public results to be ranked (#275); Mercury 2.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 7b IT and Mercury 2.5 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 7b IT has 19 scored results on Noometry and Mercury 2.5 has 2.